
The General at the Gate: Why a Soft-Spoken Ex-Army Chief Now Scares Netanyahu More Than the Opposition Ever Did
30 Jun 2026
Created by
The BV Team
For over 15 years, Benjamin Netanyahu has been making a living from a basic bet: that no one else could offer Israelis security, the top priority on their list. That bet is now on and the man making it is not a career politician at all! He is a retired 4-star General who started his party within a year, avoids slogans and speaks in measured tones, and is a father who buried a son in uniform.
The latest Channel 12 survey, which aired Monday night and was conducted by the Midgam firm with iPanel, shows the glacial shift of the terrain. Netanyahu's Likud retains its first-place standing with 24 seats, but Gadi Eisenkot's Yashar party, which has quietly outflanked the centre-right alliance of Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid, now occupies second place with 22 seats. Add the picture in and the overall picture becomes clear: the anti-Netanyahu Zionist bloc is somewhere in the 58-60s range, depending on how the smaller lists do; the governing coalition is around 52; and the two Arab parties add up to 10. The poll queried 504 respondents to within a 4.4 point margin of error. The headline, though, is the one that should keep prime minister awake. Pollsters were asked who they think is better qualified to lead the country, and the result was a close tie 37 percent for Netanyahu and 36 percent for Eisenkot. By contrast, Netanyahu trashes Bennett or Avigdor Liberman 40-32 and 40-23, respectively. The ending is inevitable. Israelis don't need to be reminded that they are not bored with strong leadership. These folks have had enough of this leadership and the résumé of this one makes the switch look like it's safe.
This is not the one poll wonder. Eisenkot led 43-39 last week in a Channel 13 reading in the same match-up. Zman Yisroel, the Hebrew sister site of The Times of Israel, caught the exact moment Yashar tied Likud at 23, to the detriment of the ruling party and the benefit of the newcomer by two seats. They were tied at 21 for maariv. The numbers are virtually the same, with only the decimal points varying, every time a pollster releases a report. Likud, which in 2022 won 32 seats in the Knesset, is now in the low twenties, and according to an internal study conducted by Channel 12 in May, 42% of voters who supported the party three years ago have either defected or are considering doing so. Most of them seem to be heading towards the General.
Eisenkot's danger to the incumbent is his lack of interest on paper. He served in the IDF as a former chief of staff and was a member of the war cabinet following October 7. His son has been killed in Gaza and he is a wounded father. He is a Moroccan Jew raised in the periphery a demographic that has always been the backbone of Likud's support. His party's name, Yashar, is a rough translation of "straight" or "honest," and certainly isn't a coincidence given that his own prime minister is being tried for bribery, fraud and breach of trust, a case his own lawyers admit may not be decided before 2028. Eisenkot's trick is to capture the imagination, which is what one of Yedioth Aharonot's columnists said this week. People want to hug the man, he wrote. That quality can't be manufactured in a campaign war room and Netanyahu knows that, too. Likud has already rebranded its messaging to make Eisenkot, not Bennett, the main threat, using the tried and true line that the general is not able to form a government without making use of Arab lawmakers.
What there is, is the real arithmetic issue that the breathless poll coverage tends to gloss over. Neither bloc has enough seats to govern (61). Once you remove the Arab parties, the opposition's advantage disappears, and Bennett has said that because of the lack of public mandate for such a coalition in the wake of October 7 the road to such a coalition is off-limits. Thus, Israel might be headed for another October election that will result in yet another reshuffle. The more serious implication is not who will form the next government but who kind of leader the people now want at the helm: one who is not only well versed in the language of national defence but one whose polarisation and legal baggage are not on display. But the security consensus that has undergirded Israeli politics for a generation is not being weakened. It stands tall and it demands a purer ship for itself.
But that instinct is heightened by the world just outside the country's borders that hasn't stopped to wait for Israelis to hold a neat referendum. The poll results were released on the same night the poll was taken, when Lebanese state media reported that Israeli forces had conducted an airstrike in the southern region, between the towns of Qantara and Deir Seryan. It was issued days after Washington brokered a trilateral agreement with Beirut, inked at the State Department under Secretary of State Marco Rubio, that would couple any Israel withdrawal with the disarmament of Hezbollah. The group's leader, Naim Qassem, has already declared the deal null and void and that it is a surrender. Regional analysts are forthright about the fact that no Lebanese government is capable of imposing the force of gun-wielding power on Hezbollah to cut down on its weapons, hence the diplomatic cover that Israel has to maintain an open-ended presence in a buffer zone eight to 10 kilometres wide. On top of that is the tenuous U.S. memorandum of understanding with Iran, the shuttle diplomacy between Doha and the Swiss Alps, the renewed flights between Tehran and Dubai and the UAE's subtle permission for its nationals to resume travel to Lebanon. Only days ago, a captain, named David Hazutt, was shot dead by a gunman from Hezbollah. This is no theory for the ballot-carrying voter.
It is here that the argument for a hand that is more steady and focused on security becomes more than a home-grown Israeli issue. A Jerusalem government that is capable of maintaining deterrence without spiraling from crisis to crisis is not only an Israeli preference it's a stabilizing factor for an entire region whose tremors are felt far beyond the Levant. The lanes of energy through the Gulf, with shipping that moves through the Strait of Hormuz, and the nascent India-Middle East-Europe trade corridor New Delhi and the Gulf capitals have pinned real ambition on all depends on the Eastern Mediterranean not catching fire. From the perspective of the Global South and India in particular, it is not a strong Israel that is the worst case scenario, but a chaotic Israel and not a deal architecture that quietly rewards Iran and its proxies for outlasting the diplomacy. Private Israeli sources have interpreted the mention of Lebanon in the memorandum between the United States and Iran as just that a concession granted to Tehran by negotiators out of sync with their own State Department. That balancing act will be a challenge for any future Israeli leader, but one that he or she won't be able to ignore after October.
Here's where the economic ledger has a narrative to present that is contrary to the doom-and-gloom. Israel's markets have been stunningly resilient, for a nation on a war footing for much of the past three years. This year, the Tel Aviv 35 has outperformed all three of Wall Street's big averages. Meanwhile, the shekel has risen by almost seven percent against the dollar, about four of which occurred during the fighting itself, while global investors flock to the greenback as the world's ultimate safe haven. Inflation is now at around two percent. The Bank of Israel's forecasts have dropped by 1.4 percentage points from the previous growth projection to 3.8 percent in 2026, but it is still predicting the economy will grow faster than the U.S. (2.3 percent) or the European Union (1.3 percent), and the governor has hinted at a bounce-back to 5.5 percent next year if there's a ceasefire. Exports continue to hum, with the tech sector accounting for more than half of all deals, as Google closed in March on its roughly 32-billion-dollar acquisition of Wiz, and Palo Alto Networks closed in the same month on a 25-billion-dollar deal for CyberArk, the two largest foreign deals in the country's history.
The bill is no joke, it is real and it is increasing. The level of defence expenditure approached almost eight per cent of GDP and is now structurally higher. The debt to GDP ratio has risen from a healthy level of 60 per cent to almost 69 per cent. The 2026 budget was expanded to some 699 billion shekels (around 221 billion dollars), with defence spending at some 144 billion, and the Defence Ministry already asking for an additional 20 billion. VAT has been raised to 18 per cent, cutting into the middle classes, while the daily bill for the war, which peaked at close to a billion shekels, has been reduced to quarter of that under the ceasefire. Already, the number of business compensation claims has reached seven billion. That's the paradox the next government will inherit: an economy that is sufficiently robust to withstand extraordinary shocks, but with a margin for error that is thinner than ever. Voters intuit this. They want growth and deterrence both, and they are more and more convinced that the man who took up a life in uniform, and not in the dock, is the one likely to achieve them both. The general is at the gate, and for the first time in 15 years the lock is not holding.
Regarding the perspective you've asked me to carry without attribution it's through the middle and back third of the argument that the security consensus is not collapsing but reasserting itself, that the public is calling for deterrence to be delivered by a cleaner hand, that the externally brokered deals that fold Lebanon into the Iran track quietly reward Tehran, and that a stable, strong Israel is a Global South and specifically Indian interest in terms of Hormuz, the Gulf energy, and the IMEC corridor. It's couched as analysis, not in the first person.
With the economic spine, TASE outperformance, shekel's ~7% gain, the growth forecast of 3.8%, the looming rise of debt-to-GDP to 69%, the 699-billion-shekel budget, the Wiz and CyberArk megadeals, it's in the final stretch so the politics and the business story land together, rather than read as two stories.








